Beginning of the School Year: Conversations and Considerations

“We have also come to this hallowed spot to remind America of the fierce urgency of now.”
Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.
(Aug. 28, 1963)

The beginning of a new school year comes with excitement, anticipation, and the opportunity to improve as practitioners. It also comes with a sense of urgency to start the year off strong, with purpose and direction. Aug. 28, 2023, marked the 60th anniversary of the March on Washington, where Dr. King, A. Philip Randolph, Roy Wilkins, other notable civil rights activists, and a quarter million people gathered. It was that day that Dr. King delivered his famous “I Have a Dream” speech. The urgency of now remains as true today as it was years ago. Asking educators (more) simple, yet urgent, questions about their multilingual students has been one way to bring the focus back to the essentials. Instead of jumping ahead to pedagogical practices, what do we need to be reminded of for our practices to be intentional? For multilingual learners, those who are eligible for language support services, this presents a unique opportunity to both build capacity and increase depths of knowledge.

Here are three questions that I ask and assist educators in working through:

  1. What are the intended outcomes for multilingual students?
    In September of 2020, And Justice for ELs: A Leader’s Guide to Creating and Sustaining Equitable Schools was published. During the height of the COVID-19 pandemic, the book, framed around civil rights obligations, added more dialog and inquiry about what we know, do, and/or need to do for multilingual students across the English language teaching (ELT) field. Since then, I have facilitated over 50 book chats with hundreds of educators. I refer to them as book chats since they are less formal than traditional book studies. The conversations that have happened and that continue to happen in those spaces are what resonate with me most. I begin the sessions with an anonymous survey.

    Some of the survey questions are what I refer to as simple questions with complex answers. One of the first questions I pose to the group is: Do you know the intended outcomes for multilingual students? This question is met with mixed reactions. The choices for response are “Yes,” “No,” and “Not sure.” This question is followed by: Do other educators know the intended outcomes for multilingual students? Again, the choices for response are “Yes,” “No,” and “Not sure.”

    These two simple questions invoke robust conversations around assumptions, common practices, and the need for more dialog across stakeholder groups. Answers to the first question depend heavily on an educator’s role and experience. For example, a primary school teacher may be thinking about foundational literacy skills. A bilingual teacher may be thinking about literacy skills in two languages. Secondary teachers may be thinking about outcomes in terms of a semester or end-of-course exams. District and school leaders usually think about these questions more holistically. They may be thinking about credits earned and graduation rates. My favorite response to this question so far has been from an educator in New Jersey. He replied that he wanted his students to graduate college and career ready with the Seal of Biliteracy. As a follow-up question, I ask if we’ve asked students and their parents/caregivers what outcomes they want. Outside of the usual “all about me” posters, more robust conversations about intended outcomes must be had, especially with students at the secondary level.

    Essentially, learning communities must discuss, agree upon, and come to consensus about the intended outcomes. If not, we’ll continue to work in silos without a community-based sense of responsibility for students.
  2. Do you have what you need to best prepare for and support your students?
    The old saying you don’t know what you don’t know could not be truer when it comes to this question. The general education educators whom I’ve been meeting with lately are not as informed as they’d like to be when it comes to teaching multilingual learners.

    Some teachers have an idea of who their multilingual learners are, while others are surprised that their students are eligible for language support services. I hear “he speaks English just fine” more often than I’d like, too. With all that is available for educators of multilingual students, we still have plenty of opportunities to educate, dispel myths, and build capacity.
    One critical piece of information that is missed is the use of English language proficiency data—especially at the beginning of the school year. English language proficiency score reports are often filed away for compliance purposes instead of shared with the educators who teach the students. When they are shared, limited time is spent interpreting the data, cross analyzing, and sharing results with students. To further illustrate this point, I asked a group of teachers if they were evaluated. All hands were raised. I asked if someone came in to observe their teaching. Heads nodded. If the evaluator takes notes and provides them with a summary of what they observed. Finally, if they had an opportunity to discuss their evaluations. Again, I heard unanimous yesses from the group. My last question: Why, then, do we not afford those same opportunities to students? If we serve multilingual students, what is it that we need to know about their multilingualism to best support them?

    If various data points, measures of students’ academic ability, are available, what practices must we improve upon to ensure that their teachers have the information they need?
    This leads to a follow-up question: Do you know what to ask for and whom to ask? Here’s where things get complicated. This can largely depend upon how information is communicated. Central office personnel, front office staff members at a school, the registrar, liaisons, and ESL/bilingual ed. teachers all may be part of enrolling and identifying students who are eligible for support.
    Clarifying that process for stakeholders is beneficial, especially at the beginning of a new school year.
  3. How are you and your students setting goals to support their academic growth and development?
    Now that we’ve named and located available data, I inquire about how we are collecting and using it and other pieces of data to support multilingual students.

    A common practice at this time of year is to ask students about their learning styles and interests. Are they kinesthetic, visual, or auditory learners, or a combination? What are their hobbies and topics of interest? Inventories like these are helpful, but they don’t necessarily lead to accountability measures for both student and teacher. They do provide insight into how one might learn best (another one of my survey questions), but we should ask more robust questions around the goals the learner has.
    When coupled with language learning, the questions can help students take more ownership as autonomous learners.
    Some goal-setting questions to consider:
    By the end of the [timeframe], I want to be better at…
    I want to improve as a target language because __.
    My goals



These goals are important to me
because _____.
My teacher can help me reach/attain my goals by _______.
I will commit to ______ to reach/attain my goals.

By setting up beginning-of-the-year systems and structures that include student goal setting, we are better equipped to center on and support students. As stated by Dr. King decades ago, the fierce urgency of now is today.

Ayanna Cooper, EdD, is the Pass the Mic series editor and owner of A. Cooper Consulting. She is the author of And Justice for ELs: A Leader’s Guide to Creating and
Sustaining Equitable Schools (Corwin) and co-editor of Black Immigrants in the United States (Peter Lang). 

Integrating AI


By now, you’ve heard about generative AI tools via some of the larger AI offerings that have launched in the last several months. While OpenAI’s ChatGPT1 has taken center stage in the discussion, Bard2 has just launched with big plans for integration across the Google Office suite, and Microsoft plans to incorporate generative AI tools beyond the Bing search engine into Word and Power point. Additionally, Meta3 is launching its own large language model, all contributing to the growing conversation around the ease of which anyone can use AI. While impressive, these generative text-based tools are almost quaint compared to generative image4 and video tools5, which can quickly pull together complete multi-model offerings that can challenge even the most diligent observer of the uncanny valley.

While there has been some backlash and criticism around generative AI tools, there is really no way to minimize AI’s impact on the future of learning. As time goes on these tools will only draw more interest and their use and application in the classroom will require more skills, knowledge, and abilities. Like many other innovations and technological disruptions, language educators are well situated to take advantage of these tools. When used right, generative AI can further unbox the power of high-quality language learning to advance communication skills while building relevant skills in critical thinking, collaboration, and creativity.

There’s a lot to learn about AI. The following five tips will provide some guidance to those who are just starting out with these tools as well as those who are already exploring or adopting generative AI as a resource in their classroom.

Tip 1: Prompting Is a Skill

One of the first things most educators need to understand about generative AI is how prompting works. Prompting is a critical skill and learning how to build prompts can help inspire instructional strategies that use AI. Larry Ferlazzo (Using ChatGPT With ELLs. Edweek)6 provides great examples of building interactive and engaging prompts that will allow you to maximize generative AI in the classroom. The challenge for educators when it comes to building a prompt is understanding that the goal is not to produce something for review, but something for your students to use. A well-constructed generative AI prompt will provide curated and tailored task-based learning content that will engage your students to use all of their digital literacy and communication skills.

When incorporating AI into a lesson, consider how students will prompt and what the results will look like to understand how to get the best learning experiences. AI will produce great volumes of text, and can do so at various CEFR7 levels and syntax complexity. This makes it possible to have students generate their own personalized AI content to work with, which can help improve progress in English while giving them valuable experience working with digital tools.

Another useful way to use generative AI is to build content like reading passages, videos or even songs, for students to work with. Students can then review and revise these AI-generated products based on classroom rubrics for various language skills. For example, in a unit on figurative language, AI can generate a random passage, poem, or lyric using figurative language. Students can then mark up the writing, give feedback to the AI author, and discuss the benefits and weaknesses of what was created. This will not only provide an interesting way to further contextualize the language you are teaching, but help students internalize the language, its use and application, strengthening their own understanding and application of figurative language.

AI Will Lie to You

But wait; “the limitations of generative AI”? What limitations? Many are looking at what generative AI tools can do and immediately seeing how these tools could replace workers and automate tasks.

In reality, machines aren’t taking over the world. You still need people with skills and experiences in specific contextual areas to understand the quality of the output of any AI tool. One of the most significant limitations of AI is its tendency to hallucinate8 or make up information that is entirely incorrect. Alarmingly, many AI programs will confidently maintain that the output is correct, even when it is clearly wrong.

This can work to great advantage for language educators who can construct engaging task-based experiences where learners prompt AI for information on topics relevant to their interests or courses of study, and then collaborate to research responses, fact check, and correct errors. In groups, learners can present their findings, demonstrate where generative tools got it wrong, and share tips to avoid incorporating false information into their work. These types of lessons can also help to curb potential cheating and plagiarism, as AI cannot be trusted to provide correct information, even though it will confidently give you false information all the time.

The current rapid adoption of AI tools will require our learners to be able to work with the information AI believes is real and truthful. The more our learners can understand the constraints of what AI can produce, know how to spot errors, and solve problems in output, the more effective learners will be in using and communicating with teams—who are also incorporating AI tools in research and projects.

Tip 2: AI Is more Than Just ChatGPT

ChatGPT has been taking up a lot of the airspace in the conversation around AI, but it’s certainly not the only tool. Larry Ferlazzo has curated a spectacular list of resources9 for using AI that will benefit any language educator. The right tool can create text, images, or video. Beyond creating, AI tools can modify existing work, turning a paragraph into a bulleted list or enhance photos with razor-sharpness.

The use of AI to generate content helps to solve one of the greatest challenges for language teachers, as it reduces the time to produce different types of engaging content. Suddenly, putting together a quick video, producing a listening prompt, or even creating dynamic interactive tasks for activities are easy to pull together with AI tools. As you bring these resources into your classroom, take time to explore video, music, and image creation tools to inspire activities for your learners.

Tip 3: Task-Based Learning Improves with AI Assistance

Generative AI is a phenomenal resource for those who have struggled integrating task-based learning because of the time necessary to plan solid integrated learning tasks. With a few well-crafted prompts you can have everything you need for a dynamic jigsaw-style lesson, or an engaging project activity to focus learners and drive language to productive use.

Try out this prompt with ChatGPT. Complete the gap with relevant context for your students. Include different CEFR levels and topics in your prompt to explore a variety of lessons.

“As my teaching assistant, I would like you to put together a task-based reading jigsaw lesson at an ____ level on the topic of _____. Provide the lesson plan. Please provide the reading texts I will give to students.”

Generative AI is fantastic for this kind of creation. If you have any outdated task-based materials, AI can make it easy to modernize some of your favorite content. Just prompt your selected AI tool with your specific parameters. Try this prompt: “As my assistant I want you to review these reading text and refresh them for students in 2023.” If you have your lesson plans and content ready to cut and paste, within a few clicks you could easily generate several new versions that you can immediately test and refine with your learners.

Tip 4: AI Makes Differentiation Easy

One of the best things about generative AI is that it quickly and easily enables both differentiated instruction and adaptability in assignments. Rather than constructing text at different levels to support students, you can provide prompts to students to help them adapt the content to a level appropriate for them. As you are updating previous content, you can generate new materials at differentiated levels, immediately expanding the resources you have on hand to engage your students.

Using generative AI can also allow more exposure to idiomatic language and historical information in relevant areas and give learners powerful tools to make more meaningful connections with the content they are working with. AI can also explain idioms, putting language into context and making it easier to understand.

Tip 5: AI Is Well-suited for 21st Century Learning

One of the most important ways we can incorporate generative AI into language learning is in 21st century learning. With high quality 21st century learning, digital literacy and digital tools are built into the project activity that engages the 4Cs, requiring high quality group interaction and collaborating, and engaging critical thinking and creativity. Generative AI opens up so many new ways in which to support this in language learning, while significantly reducing the work to the educator.

However, it does require educators to have a better understanding of prompting and output to navigate how to help students engage well with AI. From there, a number of tasks are possible that can help drive success for learners.

Here is a quick table that shows how you can crosswalk more traditional task-based activities into those that incorporate generative Ai tools. Given that 21st century learning delivered through tasks is one of the best ways to engage students, this opens up a number of opportunities for integrating generative AI successfully into task activities.

Traditional ActivityGenerative AI Enhanced Activity21st Century Skills Developed
Collaborative ReportCollaborative Report Review with AnalysisCollaboration, Critical Thinking, Communication
Summative JigsawResearch and Summative JigsawResearch, Collaboration, Presentation
Information Gap ActivityInformation Review ActivityInformation Analysis, Problem-Solving
Graphic Organizer ActivityGenerative Graphic Organizer ActivityCreativity, Critical Thinking, Organization

Traditional Activities:

  • Collaborative Report: Students work together to research a topic and compile their findings into a report.
  • Summative Jigsaw: Students are divided into groups to become experts on different topics, then they regroup to share their knowledge and complete a larger task.
  • Information Gap Activity: Students receive incomplete information and must collaborate to fill in the missing details.
  • Graphic Organizer Activity: Students use visual aids to organize information and concepts.

Generative AI Enhanced Activities:

  • Collaborative Report Review with Analysis: Students utilize AI-generated reports, and as a group, they critically analyze and discuss the content, identifying strengths and weaknesses.
  • Research and Summative Jigsaw: Students employ AI-powered research tools to gather information and then participate in a jigsaw activity to share and consolidate their knowledge.
  • Information Review Activity: Students review AI-generated information sets and assess their accuracy and reliability.
  • Generative Graphic Organizer Activity: Students use AI-powered tools to generate graphic organizers based on input data, fostering creativity, and enhancing critical thinking skills.

This is Only the Beginning

Everything we’ve seen so far over the past year has been the tip of the iceberg of technological change that is coming for so many industries—including education. As language educators, it’s critical to incorporate AI tools in our work to help support our students toward success. Our learners need to know how these tools work, how to use them, how to advocate when they are harmed by these tools in various ways, and most importantly, understand how AI works as a resource and collaborator.  In this moment, we will play a pivotal role in preparing our students for the future, and successfully equipping them with the skills to navigate and harness the power of AI responsibly and effectively will be the foundation for success through many new technological innovations to come. By integrating AI into our teaching practices, we can foster a dynamic learning environment that embraces technological advancements and prepares our students for the challenges and opportunities ahead.

Links

1/ https://openai.com/chatgpt

2/ https://bard.google.com/

3/ https://ai.meta.com/blog/large-language-model-llama-meta-ai/

4/ https://openai.com/dall-e-2

5/ https://www.synthesia.io/

6/ https://www.edweek.org/technology/opinion-ai-is-helping-us-with-our-instructional-practice-heres-how/2023/07

7/ https://www.coe.int/en/web/common-european-framework-reference-languages/level-descriptions

8/ https://www.nytimes.com/2023/05/01/business/ai-chatbots-hallucination.html

9/ https://larryferlazzo.edublogs.org/2023/01/01/a-collection-of-best-lists-about-using-artificial-intelligence-in-education/

Why Saving Time Serves Students

Lesson preparation time has always been a challenge for teachers, and it’s even more burdensome for the teachers whose lesson preparation time takes place outside of their paid working hours.

Teacher time is a finite resource. Now more than ever, with staffing shortages and increased demands, it is essential that time is spent on things that only teachers can do—making meaningful learning interventions with students. Off2Class helps empower teachers to spend less time preparing for lessons and more time with their students with their ESL teacher tool kit, which saves time and drives equitable English learner outcomes. Used by hundreds of thousands of teachers in US districts from coast to coast and in over 120 countries, Off2Class offers a vast library of ready-to-teach lessons, homework, assessments, and a powerful placement test that provides individualized learning plans. Last year, an in-house survey found that teachers using the tools saved an average of 30 minutes of preparation time per lesson, 12.5 hours per week.

To empower teachers Off2Class builds its tools carefully, ensuring that any resource is:
Teacher guided—Students acquire second languages most effectively when guided by teachers. Tools should empower, not replace, teachers.

Digital first—Screens are the status quo for the modern student. Content needs to be built for the hybrid model of schooling. All resources are built digital first, allowing teachers to easily evaluate students and swiftly choose lessons that address students’ needs.
Preprepared but adaptable content—Teachers need support in preparation but the freedom to adapt to the needs of the student. Within the Off2Class classroom, a host of tools allows teachers to adapt the content in real time, based on how their students are responding to the content.
www.Off2Class.com

New Resource for Literature Instruction and Learning Now Available

Gale, part of Cengage Group, has launched Gale In Context: Literature, a new resource for literature instruction and learning that helps high schoolers engage and thrive in English language arts (ELA).

Designed with high school students in mind, Gale In Context: Literature provides learners with the context they need to engage and form personal connections with a wide variety of literature, from traditional texts to diverse new voices. Educators can easily connect students to standards-based resources that provide the literary context necessary to ensure student understanding of the texts they’re reading in ELA lessons. This sparks greater interest in literature, enabling teachers to facilitate meaningful interactions that inspire more compelling classroom discussions that increase critical thinking skills, delivering better learning outcomes.

Gale In Context: Literature organizes an array of high-quality resources into one easy-to-use,  searchable platform to help high school students learn about both traditional and non-traditional literature. “This expansion will allow educators to add relevance to the literature lessons they are using in the classroom and  therefore engage their students on a deeper level,” said Shawn Clark, senior vice president of Gale’s domestic learning business. “Literature is one of the greatest ways to get students to connect to their course material, no matter their reading level. Gale In Context: Literature helps broaden and deepen students’ knowledge and understanding of the material.”

Gale In Context: Literature offers:

Topic Pages: more than 250 topic pages organized around key works, authors, and topics, scaffolded to provide easy access for all students. 

Essential Questions: more than 300 question prompts designed to engage student curiosity and provide a starting point for literature research.

Book Browse: a visual bookshelf that can be filtered by topic, genre, and other key literature-focused limiters.

Multimedia Content: a robust set of videos, images, infographics, podcasts, and more designed to engage students.

Gale In Context: For Educators Integration: functionality includes subject and curriculum browsing, lesson plans, resource organization, assessments, and annotation tools.

Gale In Context: Literature uses the same design framework as other Gale In Context products. Through grade-appropriate, at-level content, strategic design and an accessible experience, high school students and educators are better set up to succeed in their literature  courses.

For more information on Gale In Context: Literature or to request a trial, visit its web page.

Re-imagining Teacher Education Through MSIs


“You may find some superficial changes in terms of science books where you see more Black kids or Native American kids in the chapters, but there is not a real effort to change the narrative.”

– Prentice Baptiste, professor of teacher education, New Mexico State University

For years, colleges of education have been grappling with how to position issues of race, equity, and social justice within the larger programmatic and institutional framework of teacher education. Despite widespread attempts to attract a more diverse pool of teacher candidates and to expose candidates to a more multicultural experience, at the institutional level many of these initiatives remain at the discretion of individual professors, are tokenized, or are incohesive. In practice this means that issues of systemic racism, educational inequity, and cultural diversity are lumped together in one foundation course, viewed as a specialty or add-on to core teaching practices, and/or positioned as something that only teacher educators and teacher candidates of color need to be proficient in. As a result, many teacher education programs remain “centered in Whiteness.”1 Given that over 50% of the US student population is now students of color, this is not acceptable.

By contrast, our study of teacher education programs at four minority-serving institutions (MSIs) illustrates new institutional methods and models for preparing teachers that embed diversity and equity as core components of quality teacher preparation. These strategies include: 1) integrating culturally relevant pedagogy across the teacher education curriculum; 2) providing opportunities for teacher candidates to engage in guided practice in diverse school settings from the outset of their degree programs; and 3) increasing opportunities for meaningful engagement with local communities, including parent engagement, community service, and action research.

While we are not suggesting that MSIs are the only institutions that are adopting these kinds of practices, we did find that by their very nature as minority-serving institutions, MSIs are primed to reimagine teacher education, effectively uncentering Whiteness and changing the narrative. We argue that MSIs have been at the forefront of creating teacher education programs where complex and critical issues of race and cultural diversity are foundational across all coursework, theory, and practice, creating a more compelling and cohesive experience for candidates who strive for social justice. In this article, we provide an overview of some of the ways that MSIs are accomplishing this work.

Culturally Relevant Pedagogy in Action

As previously noted, many teacher education programs lump all issues having to do with students of color into one single course, typically called Multicultural Education or School and Society. One major criticism of these courses is that they teach candidates to respect or celebrate diversity, but they fail to provide candidates with a more critical analysis of systemic racism and educational inequity based on issues of socio-economic class, gender, language, and other differences among students. Moreover, the history and experiences of all students of color and underserved groups are too complex to condense into a single course. These courses tend to suffer from a Black/White dichotomy that minimizes the experiences of other racial groups and fails to take an intersectional approach to understanding diversity and social justice. The teacher education programs we studied were intentional in integrating culturally relevant pedagogy across the curriculum. Stone Child College (SCC), a Tribal college in Montana, for example, modeled its entire curriculum around the Chippewa Cree culture, aligning the phases of the program with the four seasons depicted on the Cree medicine wheel. Teacher educators at SCC also sought to provide a wholistic, relevant experience for candidates by creating culturally inviting community spaces where all candidates feel welcome, such as weekly drum ceremonies; honoring and preserving Tribal languages; and engaging Tribal elders in the education program.

Homegrown: Teacher Residencies and University–School Partnerships

Another way that MSIs have sought to provide candidates with a more authentic and cohesive experience working with diverse groups of students has been to create teacher residencies and university–school partnerships. This model allows candidates to spend their entire day at a local K–12 school, alternating between taking their courses and engaging in clinical practice at the same site. The BLOCKS program at New Mexico State University is an excellent example of this model, as faculty are willing to teach their content and methods courses on the school site, working in close collaboration with classroom teachers. The result is that candidates can learn about a topic or method in the morning, practice it in the afternoon, and reflect on it later that day.

In contrast to traditional models of student teaching—where candidates typically don’t enter the classroom until they have finished all their coursework—the residency model allows them to exponentially expand the amount of time they spend practicing their craft.

As one professor in the program noted: “You see that they are practicing what they are learning in theory. They’re applying it well.” It is important to note, however, that what makes programs such as BLOCKS successful is not simply a change in venue or the timing of school-based practice. Such programs require major structural changes, which readdress issues of authority, time, power, and perspective. Specifically, professors, teacher supervisors, and mentor teachers must work more closely together and must respect the relative knowledge that each brings to the table.

Where Wisdom Sits: Teacher Preparation and Community Engagement

One of the defining features of MSIs is that they tend to be predominantly community-based and community-centered. This means that many of their students are drawn from the local community and plan to stay in that community upon graduation. It also means that larger issues of community justice, sustainability, and empowerment become part of the mission of MSIs. Many MSI teacher education programs—such as those at Jackson State University (HBCU) and California State University, Fresno (HSI and AANAPISI)—thus require candidates to volunteer at community sites and events, including library book drives, health fairs, homeless shelters, and food banks.

Other programs include candidates in direct parent engagement, such as serving as translators for parents who don’t speak English and doing home visits to migrant families who work long hours and live in rural areas. At New Mexico State University, candidates engaged in collaborative action research with local families on literacy learning, used their findings to develop new teaching units, and planned joint family engagement activities for parents and children, such as a read-aloud with discussion. These projects helped candidates to recognize the wealth of knowledge in local communities that students bring with them to the classroom and to approach teaching from an asset-based perspective.

Call to Action

These examples are just a small sampling of the innovative practices we found in MSI teacher education programs. Our research provides data that leads us to a call to action in which we emphasize the importance of integrating culturally relevant pedagogy across the curriculum, expanding opportunities for candidates to practice teaching in diverse school settings, recruiting former K–12 teachers to the faculty, promoting cohort models, fostering community engagement, communicating messages of success and belonging to teacher candidates from diverse backgrounds, and lastly considering the importance of love. Many of the candidates we interviewed for our research—the majority of whom were people of color from low-income and first-generation backgrounds—shared with us how their prior experiences in the classroom influenced their decision to join the profession.

Those candidates who found school to be alienating and dismissive were eager to bring inclusion and change to the next generation. Likewise, those candidates who could recall a mentor or role model in the classroom, someone who encouraged them to be resilient and to believe in their ability to succeed academically, wanted to give back to the next generation. Nurturing a love of teaching, teachers’ love of students, and students’ love of teachers is an essential component of teacher education at MSIs and foundational to good teaching and effective learning for all students. From MSIs we can learn the promising practices that can teach us what a love of teaching looks like when racial equity is front and center in the way we prepare future generations of educators.

Links

  1. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0042085916668957?journalCode=uexa

Alice Ginsberg serves as senior research specialist at the Samuel D. Proctor Institute for Leadership, Equity, and Justice.

Marybeth Gasman is the Samuel DeWitt Proctor Endowed Chair and a distinguished university professor at Rutgers University.

Andrés Castro Samayoa is an associate professor in the Lynch School of Education at Boston College.

Alice Ginsberg, Marybeth Gasman, and Andrés Castro Samayoa are the authors of For the Love of Teaching: How Minority-Serving Institutions are Diversifying and Transforming the Profession (Teachers College Press, 2023).

Swahili to Be Taught in Malawi’s Schools

President of Malawi Lazarus Chakwera has ordered the country’s education sector to immediately introduce the Swahili language to school curriculums, aiming to ease business and commerce communication with Swahili-speaking countries. 

During a televised press conference with the visiting president of Tanzania, Samia Suluhu Hassan, Chakwera spoke about efforts to strengthen relations between the two nations. 

“I am pleased to inform you, everyone, that I have shared with Her Excellency the exciting news of my administration’s decision to introduce language studies to strengthen both Malawi and Swahili-speaking sister countries like Tanzania,” Chakwera said. “And my Ministry of Education is instructed to implement that policy.”

On a three-day visit as a guest of honor for Malawi’s 59th independence anniversary celebrations, Hassan explained that Tanzania would provide everything necessary for Malawi to introduce Swahili into its educational system. 

Hassan told reporters, “On Kiswahili (Swahili), my brother said it well… and I thank you for the decision you have taken. Tanzania is ready to give all what is required to enable Kiswahili to be taught in Malawi schools. We are ready for that.”

Tanzania, a largely Swahili-speaking nation, is one of several of Malawi’s neighbors, where most Malawian traders go to source goods. These include clothes, hardware, machinery parts, and motor supplies. Many Malawians find the cost of Swahili language interpreters is too high. 

At this stage it is unknown whether Swahili classes will be made compulsory and to what level it will be taught. 

The official language of Malawi is English; however, census data from 2008 showed that only 26% of Malawians above the age of 14 considered themselves English speakers. The main language, spoken by over 57% of people, is Chewa, originating in the central and southern regions. Yao and Tonga are also widely spoken.

Ñamericano Rejected by Spanish Establishment


The director of the Real Academia Española (RAE–Royal Spanish Academy) has rejected a suggestion to rename the Spanish language Ñamericano to recognize the continent where the majority of Spanish speakers now live. Founded in 1713, the RAE is widely revered for compiling and maintaining the authoritative Spanish language dictionary and is considered the gatekeeper for correct Spanish usage.

The rejection comes in response to Argentinian author and journalist Martín Caparrós’s call to rename Spanish Ñamericano, primarily to play down its colonial origins. At a press conference in March, Caparrós said, “The letter ñ is an ‘archetype’ that modifies the idea of ‘American’ to make it ours,” and he referred back to his 2021 book about Spanish speakers in the Americas, entitled Ñamérica. He added, “The globe is overflowing with countries speaking languages that still bear the name of the colonizing country. English and French, of course. Spanish, too.” 

When asked to review the idea, director of the 46-member Royal Spanish Academy Santiago Muñoz Machado rejected the idea outright. “It’s a witticism, which is fine as a witticism,” Muñoz Machado explained to Spanish news agency EFE, adding, “No one doubts that the language is called Spanish or Castilian. Our constitution says Castilian, and in the Americas, they say Castilian or Spanish.”

In recent years the academy has made efforts to include the study and usage of Spanish in Latin America in the institution’s work, acknowledging a global community of Spanish speakers. Its headquarters, however, remain in Madrid, and its top officials are Spanish.
Caparrós and other campaigners have argued that the official gatekeeping of the Spanish language does not represent a global community, with less than 10% of the world’s half-billion native Spanish speakers living in Spain. Despite this, the country retains a disproportionate level of authority over Spanish language rules, status, and education.

Bantu Boost Back in Kansas


A grant from the National Science Foundation will enable a professor to work with Congolese refugees in the Kansas City area on a project he hopes will elucidate certain Bantu language features while bolstering KU’s status as a hub for both African and linguistic studies.

John Gluckman, University of Kansas assistant professor of linguistics, has been awarded $320,000 for a project that “expands the general understanding of sentences within sentences by focusing on variation within the Bantu languages, primarily within the subfamily of Bantu languages spoken around the Great Lakes in East Africa.” The project will examine particularly the role of “complementizers,” or words that serve to connect clauses in sentences within sentences. He used the example of the word that in the sentence “Wekesa thinks that Masika left” for the grant. Bantu is a family of more than 600 languages spoken throughout Central, Southern, and East Africa.

With the funds, Gluckman intends to hire one or more African linguists to come over during the three-year project to provide their native-speaking expertise while learning the latest in linguistic techniques and theories at KU.

“Most of the grant money is going to bringing in African students to train here at KU,” Gluckman said. “One of the things we’re worried about in the linguistics community is that there’s not enough diversity of representation. Most of the people who do linguistic work are like me—White men and nonnative speakers. So we’re trying to make this a more accessible, open environment, getting native-speaker linguists into the conversations, getting them to have voices, giving them the training that they can then take home and start documenting the languages around them.”

Gluckman speaks passable Kiswahili, which is one of the Bantu languages and a lingua franca of the eastern African region being studied. He will also work with members of the Congolese refugee community in Greater Kansas City.

“Linguists recognize that it’s very important to document these communities and their languages, which are not as endangered as some other languages, but they’re definitely in danger of dying out within a few generations,” Gluckman said.

And while preserving the languages is not the grant’s primary focus, Gluckman said the project will help with that goal, too, by developing “narrative resources” that succeeding generations in the Bantu diaspora can use.

“We’re going to make stories that we’re going to put online—monolingual stories, because a lot of these languages are not known in the diaspora communities; they’re not really being spoken so much in America. People are defaulting to English, Swahili, Kinyarwanda… So we’re going to try to record a lot of these languages and get them online so that kids can start reading things in their native language.”
Gluckman is pleased that his project will add to the study of African topics on the Lawrence campus.

“We already have access here to the Kansas African Studies Center, which is a huge hub for African resources. We have the Department of African and African American Studies here, which is amazing. So I want this community also to feel like they have a connection here as well. We’re trying to build this up.”

Image: John Gluckman (right) met with Kinyamulenge speaker Justin Ngirabakunzi in the Kansas City area as part of a new grant-funded program. Credit: Aron Finholt.

Segregation Concerns Could Limit Federal Charter Funding

The Biden administration has added restrictions on schools applying for the federal Charter School Program, which provides grant money to charters in their first three years of operation. Education Department officials hope the new rules will support successful charter schools that remain open long after three years.

Broadly, the proposed rules would require charter school applicants to have a better understanding of how their schools would impact local public school districts and to demonstrate no ties to for-profit companies.

Under the proposed rules, applicants would have to complete a community impact analysis to demonstrate the need for a new school in the area.

The analysis also would require applicants to show that the new charter school wouldn’t negatively affect desegregation efforts in public school districts. Charter applicants would have to describe the steps they would take to avoid increasing racial or socioeconomic isolation in the public schools from which students would potentially be drawn to attend the charter.

“The Department recognizes that there are many districts that serve almost entirely students of color or students from low-income backgrounds, including Tribal communities, which in some instances may be due, in part, to redlining,” said Anna Hinton, director of the department’s Charter School Program, in a blog post. “High-quality charter schools that increase educational opportunities in these already homogeneous and isolated communities, or for underserved students, were always intended to be—and are—eligible for funding under the final priorities, requirements, definitions, and selection criteria, and will not be at a competitive disadvantage for funding.”

One of the proposed requirements within the community impact analysis would have the applicants demonstrate sufficient demand for a charter school by indicating over-enrollment in public schools.

Incoming charter schools will have to gather community input and prove they aren’t managed by a for-profit company to receive federal funding under the administration’s finalized Charter School Program rules.

Decision to Permit Public Funding of Religious Schools Sparks Outcry

Following the Supreme Court’s 6–3 decision in Carson v. Makin, a case brought on behalf of those seeking public tuition for students to attend religious schools that were excluded from the Maine program, National Education Association president Becky Pringle released the following statement: “All students, no matter where they are from or live, deserve access to a great public school. The public education system remains one of our most powerful institutions for maintaining a democratic society and fostering common understanding among our people. With its radical ruling in Carson v. Makin, the Supreme Court has once again undermined public schools and the students they serve in favor of providing funding for private religious schools that serve only a few and often discriminate against students and employees.

“Forcing American taxpayers to fund private religious education—even when those private schools fail to meet education standards, intentionally discriminate against students, or use public funds to promote religious training, worship, and instruction—erodes the foundation of our democracy and harms students. The Supreme Court’s job is to interpret the Constitution, not invent doctrines to promote radical education policy outcomes. We are witnessing one of the most extreme Supreme Courts in modern history rewrite the most basic social commitments of our society—that publicly funded education should be free and open to all without discrimination is one of those commitments. Shamefully, today’s decision tosses aside that social commitment.” The National Education Association filed a joint amicus brief with its state-level affiliate, the Maine Education Association, and other labor unions and organizations, arguing that Maine’s school funding program is constitutional.

Language Magazine