Adult-Acquired Bilingualism Benefits the Aging Brain

New research reveals that bilingualism has a positive effect on cognition later in life. Findings published in Annals of Neurology, a journal of the American Neurological Association and Child Neurology Society, show that individuals who speak two or more languages, even those who acquired the second language in adulthood, may slow down cognitive decline from aging.

Bilingualism is thought to improve cognition and delay dementia in older adults. While prior research has investigated the impact of learning more than one language, ruling out “reverse causality” has proven difficult. The crucial question is whether people improve their cognitive functions through learning new languages or whether those with better baseline cognitive functions are more likely to become bilingual.

“Our study is the first to examine whether learning a second language impacts cognitive performance later in life while controlling for childhood intelligence,” says lead author Dr. Thomas Bak from the Centre for Cognitive Aging and Cognitive Epidemiology at the University of Edinburgh in Scotland.

For the current study, researchers relied on data from the Lothian Birth Cohort 1936, comprised of 835 native speakers of English who were born and living in the area of Edinburgh, Scotland. The participants were given an intelligence test in 1947 at age 11 years and retested in their early 70s, between 2008 and 2010. Two hundred and sixty two participants reported to be able to communicate in at least one language other than English. Of those, 195 learned the second language before age 18, 65 thereafter.

Findings indicate that those who spoke two or more languages had significantly better cognitive abilities compared to what would be expected from their baseline. The strongest effects were seen in general intelligence and reading. The effects were present in those who acquired their second language early as well as late.

“The Lothian Birth Cohort offers a unique opportunity to study the interaction between bilingualism and cognitive aging, taking into account the cognitive abilities predating the acquisition of a second language” concludes Dr. Bak. “These findings are of considerable practical relevance. Millions of people around the world acquire their second language later in life. Our study shows that bilingualism, even when acquired in adulthood, may benefit the aging brain.”

After reviewing the study, Dr. Alvaro Pascual-Leone, an Associate Editor for Annals of Neurology and Professor of Medicine at Harvard Medical School in Boston, Mass. said, “The epidemiological study by Dr. Bak and colleagues provides an important first step in understanding the impact of learning a second language and the aging brain. This research paves the way for future causal studies of bilingualism and cognitive decline prevention.”

Full citation: : “Does Bilingualism Influence Cognitive Aging?” Thomas H Bak, Jack J Nissan, Michael M Allerhand and Ian J Deary. Annals of Neurology; Published Online: June 2, 2014 (DOI:10.1002/ana.24158).

Russian Retreat in Ukraine

The Ukrainian parliament (Verkhovna Rada) has passed a bill requiring that 75% of national television programming and 50% of local broadcasting be in the Ukrainian language. The law follows an unpopular move by President Poroshenko to ban Russian-language social media websites, such as Vkontakte and Odnoklassniki.

Next on the linguistic agenda is a bill to ensure “the functioning and use of Ukrainian as a state language in all spheres of public life in the whole territory of Ukraine.” The draft bill refers to “citizens of Ukraine whose ethnic origin is not Ukrainian,” and proposes the institution of a “control commission” whose “language inspectors” would monitor whether Ukrainian was being used in public buildings, schools, and universities.

Two of the law’s sponsors, Oksana Servit and Hanna Hopko, claim that widespread usage of the Russian language undermines Ukrainian statehood, while another parliamentarian, Ivan Krulko, has argued that “it is necessary for the development of the country, which should break away from Russia.”

A poll conducted in May 2015 showed that the percentage of the country’s people who prefer to speak Ukrainian as their everyday language of communication has risen to nearly 60%, but any moves to formally discriminate against Russian language are bound to be opposed in Russia. One Russian politician, Frants Klintsevich, called the draft legislation a case of “linguistic genocide.”

Canada Boosts Support for French in the Territories

Aurora Borealis over Yellowknife, Northwest Territories

Major funding increases for Francophone communities in the western Canadian territories of Yukon, the Northwest Territories, and Nunavut have been announced. For more than three decades, the Government of Canada has supported the implementation of territorial legislation for services in French. In late 2016–17, agreements were signed with each of the territorial partners that significantly expand federal financial support for French-language services delivered by the territories. This will allow the territories to more fully meet their official-language obligations.

“Our official languages, French and English, are at the heart of who we are as a country. Our government is committed to enhancing the vitality of official-language minority communities throughout Canada, including the vibrant Francophone communities in Yukon, the Northwest Territories and Nunavut. These agreements offer a much-anticipated boost to the work being done by territorial governments to improve access to services in French,” commented Mélanie Joly, Minister of Canadian Heritage.

“Language plays a critical role in identity, and with the new agreements in place, we will be able to further support and enhance the excellent work already underway for French-language services and communications,” added Alfred Moses, minister of Education, Culture and Employment, Government of the Northwest Territories.

Under the new agreement, annual federal funding for French in the territories will increase to CAN$15 million by 2019-2020. This will enable members of the Franco-Yukonais, Franco-Ténois, and Franco-Nunavois communities to benefit from improved access to territorial services in French.

Queremos Galego

Under the slogan, “Non queremos ser estranxeiras na propia patria. Queremos Galego!” (We don’t want to be strangers in our own country. We want Galician), the Galician umbrella NGO Queremos Galego and A Mesa pola Normalización Lingüística organized a demonstration for Galician in Santiago de la Compostela. Coordinator Suzanne Méndez emphasized that people who love Galician took part in the demonstration because “only through constant social pressure can we ensure our linguistic rights and our future as a people.”

The demonstration is also in response to the government’s unraveling of Galicia’s previously successful language revitalization program and comes at a time when  A Mesa leader Carlos Callon is being criticized for simply for insisting that the correct Galician form A Coruña is used for the city instead of the Spanish La Coruña. Callon has been acquitted once over the issue, and, but now, surprisingly, has been summoned to court again with a new judge.

Opposition to Puerto Rico’s Schools Cuts


AFT’s Weingarten: “Let me be blunt: We cannot stand by as children—American citizens—are deprived of the right to receive a basic public education.”

Last month, the presidents of the American Federation of Teachers and the Asociación de Maestros de Puerto Rico (the Puerto Rico Teachers Association) co-signed a letter to the Financial Oversight and Management Board for Puerto Rico, describing the harmful impact of the deep education cuts over the past decade and the devastating consequences additional proposed reductions would have on students and Puerto Rico’s future.

The board was created under the Puerto Rico Oversight, Management and Economic Stability Act of 2016 (PROMESA) to oversee fiscal restructuring in Puerto Rico. AFT President Randi Weingarten and Asociación de Maestros de Puerto Rico President Aida Díaz de Rodriguez invited PROMESA board members to join them in visiting Puerto Rican public schools to see firsthand how the cuts have affected Puerto Rico’s schools and children.

“After years of cuts to schools and basic services, the PROMESA board is now considering cutting 40 more days from the school year on top of further cuts to an already devastated education system that is past the breaking point,” Weingarten said Wednesday. “This will leave Puerto Rico’s children—who did nothing to create these financial issues—and its economy to an even bleaker future. Let me be blunt: We cannot stand by as children—American citizens—are deprived of the right to receive a basic public education.”

Weingarten added: “We are standing in solidarity with teachers in Puerto Rico as they demand an end to the destructive cuts that their education system has endured. The PROMESA board needs to meet with teachers on the island before it blindly rewards hedge funds with deeper cuts to Puerto Rico’s schools.” Díaz said Puerto Rico’s future depends on providing a great education system. “There is no way to save Puerto Rico’s future without saving its public schools, partly because we do not have the large industries that invest back in our community,” he said.

“Education has been instrumental in the social, economic and political development of Puerto Rico. It is pivotal for the PROMESA board to have the will to give Puerto Rico the stability to grow in the future, or else our children, who are the future of Puerto Rico, will lose out.

The board has to remove cuts to education from its proposed plan, and we hope its members will accept our invitation to see schools firsthand and let us show them our schools’ needs and the damage they will do if they proceed with the proposed cuts,” Díaz said.

Celebrate but Don’t Rest on Brown v. Board

As we celebrate the 63rd anniversary of the anti-segregation decision in Brown v Board of Education, there is justifiable concern that the principles enshrined in that historical ruling are not being upheld. Research and analysis of federal data show that our schools have become more segregated, not less, over the last 20 years. Now, the typical Latinx student attends a school that’s nearly 57% Hispanic, more segregated than Blacks and Asians (UCLA Civil Rights Project/Proyecto Derechos Civiles).

Charter school advocates are also celebrating today, having won control of the Los Angeles Unified School Board, the second-largest in the country, but there is some evidence that “school choice” is contributing to segregation. A recent study of Washington DC schools concluded that: “In spite of being developed during a period of rapidly increasing diversity among city residents, charter schools have the most extreme segregation in the city.”

Ryan J. Smith, executive director of The Education Trust–West, expressed today’s situation eloquently:

“Today we rightly celebrate the milestone Brown v. Board of Education Supreme Court decision issued on May 17th, 1954 striking down school segregation. Yet today also marks another anniversary – the annual issuing of statements reminding us that, decades later, we still have not closed the gaps in access and opportunity that segregate our students and limit their ability to learn. When asked about William Faulkner’s essay urging the nation to “go slow” on integration, Brown v. Board attorney and future Supreme Court Justice Thurgood Marshall pointed out “They don’t mean go slow. They mean don’t go.”

“In education, we are quick to celebrate successes, and we should – the educators who’ve dedicated their lives to this work and the students who’ve excelled deserve nothing less. But we are also quick to use time to defend the gradual pace of progress. It is indefensible that more than half a century after Brown v. Board, we continue to subjugate our Black and Brown students to schools that are more segregated than not. While we’ve taken the “for colored only” signs off the school entryways our Black and Brown students use, we still promote policies that de facto discriminate against these students daily. We must do better.

“Nationally, we are at a crossroads as we consider the implementation of the Every Student Succeeds Act, the education civil rights law signed by President Obama. In California, we can choose the path of gradualism, or we can choose to live up to our professed values and do everything possible to eradicate the educational injustices that students face each and every day. If a group of parents in Topeka, Kansas had the strength and courage to do whatever it took to make schools better for their children in the face of fire hoses and police dogs, surely those of us currently working in education can pick up the pace.”

Easing Student Anxiety in an Uncertain Age


The Institute of International Education’s (IIE)
Mark Lazar reports on how U.S. campuses are responding to the needs and concerns of current and prospective students from the Middle East, North Africa, and beyond

To help campus leaders and admissions officers navigate these uncertain times, IIE’s Mark Lazar and a team of experts has put together a list of ten actions to encourage international students to come to the U.S. The list is not intended to be comprehensive, but it offers a platform from which to rebuild the confidence of concerned international students.

Connect with EducationUSA centers. EducationUSA advisers are on the front lines working with students and have unique insights about the situation in their countries. Visit www.educationusa.state.gov to find centers in your target countries.

Leverage your institition’s social media outlets to let international students know they are welcome. Take part in the successful #YouAreWelcomeHere social media campaign, and share specific messages about actions your campus is taking to welcome students and provide services they will need. Share pictures from activities your international office is doing now to support current students.

Enlist your current international students as ambassadors. Encourage them to reach out to newly admitted students from their countries to let them know that the campus is a welcoming and safe environment. Ask them to see if their parents are willing to talk to the parents of newly admitted students. Nothing beats students hearing from students and parents hearing from parents.

Send accepted international students periodic updates about issues of concern such as safety and visas. Include specific information about your campus and community, drawing on local, state and regional resources, including consortia that promote your state as a higher education destination, or a state-wide tourist bureau. Be creative in going beyond your traditional marketing to let students know that the school fosters a supportive, inviting, and diverse environment. For example, you can include a letter from a local mayor or governor, with a message about how much they value international students.

Highlight student associations on your campus and other peer networks. Encourage them to provide photos and create messages you can send to accepted students.

Look to your international alumni as a great resource for accepted students and their parents. Facilitate personal connections, including the opportunity to ask questions by phone, skype or twitter chat.

Don’t wait until May to start your webinars for new students. Encourage students to start their planning and visa applications early.

Visit focus countries to talk directly with students and parents. Organize admitted student events and pre-orientation activities in areas where you have many admitted students. These earlier trips can help you get ahead of the curve for next year’s recruiting efforts.

Reexamine your print and online materials to make sure they represent the diversity and welcoming nature of your campus. Start a YouTube channel for international students. Make sure your welcoming messages are easy to find on your website.

Consider offering alternative arrangements for this fall. For students who may be unable or unwilling to come to the U.S. right now, consider whether you can help them start their studies at a branch campus, study abroad location or a partner institution in another country and then transfer in or begin at the home campus at a later date.

Mark S. Lazar is the IIE’s chief of Client Engagement, Private Sector & Academic Institutions, supervises the scholarship and training programs that the Institute administers on behalf of corporations, foundations, individuals, international organizations and U.S. government agencies. Programs include: the Ford Foundation Global Travel and Learning Fund, the GE Foundation Scholar-Leaders Program, the Japan-IMF Fellowships and more than a dozen Children of Employee scholarship programs for major international corporations including AIG, Harman International and Lockheed Martin. He also oversees IIE’s Global EducationUSA Services division that supports educational advising development, outreach and training activities around the globe.

UK Push to Train Language Teachers

Sheffield Teaching School Alliance at Silverdale School

Despite Brexit–or maybe because of it–there is a desperate shortage of world language teachers in the UK, so the government is launching a program to train native speakers of French, German, and Spanish to become teachers.

The plan is to create opportunities for people with linguistic skills, whether they are living in the UK or elsewhere in Europe. “There may be people who speak French, German, or Spanish – in the UK or abroad – who would like to consider a career change and go into teaching,” said Gaynor Jones, director of the National Modern Languages SCITT (School Centred Initial Teacher Training). “For some, it could be an opportunity to experience a different culture as well as using their talents for the benefit of students keen to learn a new language.

“Our message is that we need your skills, we’ll welcome you and we’ll support you every step of the way.”

One year programs–where each trainee will work and study at two schools–will start from late summer this year.

The Government’s National College for Teaching has chosen Sheffield as the focal point of the initiative because of its longstanding and pioneering track record in teacher training, professional development, and support through schools. “There is a shortage of language teachers in state and independent schools across the country, and this scheme aims to harness our expertise to address that,” said Gaynor Jones. “We have got the team to help.

“At the same time, we want to enthuse children about languages, opening up a world of opportunities for them.”

The program is unique in that it is a partnership between the state and independent sectors. Trainees will have placements in both types of schools, thereby increasing their career options once they qualify.

The program focuses specifically on how to teach modern languages. Initially the emphasis is on teaching European languages, but a longer-term aim may see Chinese and Urdu being added to the teacher training curriculum.

“The vision is for Sheffield to become a center of excellence for language teaching, with other hubs around the country,” said Gaynor.

“We have the experience, the understanding, the support and the flexibility to see trainee teachers emerging with an internationally recognized qualification and having made good use of their skills to help young people”

Applicants must be graduates and go through the Universities and Colleges Admissions Service (UCAS). Teacher training will be balanced with academic study, leading to the award of a Postgraduate Certificate in Education (PGCE).

Practical help, such helping overseas students to find accommodation, will be offered by the National Modern Languages SCITT, and student loans will be available –there is even the possibility of grants of up to £25,000 ($30,000) for successful applicants based in the European Union.

YouTube: Introduction video – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y-5QQ3pLMYE

Trainees – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wdowdge3Z84

 

Texas Bill SB4 Threatens Vulnerable Students

With the recent approval of Texas Senate Bill 4, many of the state’s most vulnerable students will face new obstacles accessing the education they need to become contributors to our society. The bill, which was signed into law during a Facebook Live broadcast on Sunday afternoon by Governor Greg Abbot, puts a startling halt to “sanctuary cities” and the security they provide to the parents of documented and undocumented children in Texas.

The Bill
The law, which passed in the Texas house in a 94-54 vote, bans sanctuary cities throughout the state and requires local government and law enforcement officials to follow federal immigration laws. The bill also penalizes any official who refuses to cooperate with federal oversight in detaining and turning over undocumented immigrants. Officials who fail to cooperate face a civil penalty for entities in violation of the law of up to $25,500 for each day of the violation; a class A misdemeanor for a sheriff, chief of police, or constable who fails to comply with federal immigration detainer requests; and/or removal from office for any elected or appointed official who does not comply with the law. All of the components of the law will take effect on September 1.

Backlash
The law has similarities to Arizona’s controversial SB 1070, in that it authorizes law enforcement to inquire about immigration status during any and all detentions. SB1070, which is still in effect and was deemed constitutional by the Supreme Court, allows law enforcement to stop, detain, and/or arrest an individual if there is a reasonable suspicion that the individual is in the country illegally. The bill faced backlash, as many opponents claimed that the law encouraged racial profiling.

Texas SB4 is proving to be equally controversial, as the League of United Latin American Citizens, Maverick County, and the city of El Cenizo are suing the state of Texas, claiming that SB4 fails to properly define what a “sanctuary city” is. The lawsuit from El Cenizo claims, “Plaintiffs are safer when all people, including undocumented immigrants, feel safe when their local law enforcement officers can be trusted for reporting crimes or just speaking with them about issues in the community.”

Austin and the larger Travis County area are also at the center at the debate. Travis County sheriff Sally Hernandez vowed in her inauguration speech that she would no longer honor jail detainer requests from U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE).

“We cannot afford to make our community less safe by driving people into the shadows,” Hernandez said in a YouTube message. “As local law enforcement officers, we will not interrogate or arrest someone over an unrelated federal immigration matter if they are trying to report a crime.”

What This Means For Students
Public schools in Texas are required by law to serve all children, including undocumented ones, as guaranteed by the Pyler vs. Doe Supreme court decision in 1982. The decision was as follows, “Texas statute which withholds from local school districts any state funds for the education of children who were not “legally admitted” into the United States, and which authorizes local school districts to deny enrollment to such children, violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.”
This court decision ensured that all students are protected and are guaranteed education. The U.S. Department of Justice Civil Rights Division along with the U.S. Department of Education Office for Civil Rights and Office of the General Counsel also released a letter in 2014 that stated, “Under Federal law, State and local educational agencies (hereinafter “districts”) are required to provide all children with equal access to public education at the elementary and secondary level. Recently, we have become aware of student enrollment practices that may chill or discourage the participation, or lead to the exclusion, of students based on their or their parents’ or guardians’ actual or perceived citizenship or immigration status. These practices contravene Federal law. Both the United States Department of Justice and the United States Department of Education (Departments) write to remind you of the Federal obligation to provide equal educational opportunities to all children residing within your district and to offer our assistance in ensuring that you comply with the law.”
While the DOE’s statement that all children are safe to study freely is intended to be comforting to students and their parents, many continue to feel threatened and unsafe.

As previously reported by the Education department of Huffington Post, many parents in Texas feared dropping their children off at school because of threat of deportation.
The parents fear that members of ICE will stop and question them, which may ultimately lead to their arrest and deportation. Parents who fear being deported are not paranoid, as ICE recently arrested an immigrant in Los Angeles after he dropped his daughter off at school.

Other educational communities within Texas have already begun to take action before the bill was enacted. NPR Austin reported that Rodriguez Elementary in South Austin hosted an event for Education Austin’s “Know Your Rights” seminar. The seminar was made possible with a $30,000 grant from the National Education Association, and reviews what a person’s rights are if ICE agents stop them on the street. Future seminars on how parents should interact with ICE agents will surely be updated, given the passage of SB4.

New Directions for Technology Use in ELL Instruction

As K–12 districts aim to improve learning for a wide range of students facing unique challenges, education leaders need to be particularly mindful of the English language learning (ELL) student population.

Of all the students in public schools in the U.S., an estimated 9.3% were ELLs in the 2013–14 school year. Though ELL students have made strides in reading, leaping 22 points in average fourth-grade reading scores from 2000 to 2015, this group of students is consistently behind their non-ELL peers in this area.
Searching for resources to help ELL students reach the same level of language mastery as their peers, educators have often turned to technology to boost ELL instruction. In particular, technological tools have helped teachers implement speaking and listening activities that target the challenges that language learners face.
While educators continue to use tried-and-true methods of incorporating technology into ELL instruction, an expansion of available tools in the education market also invites educators to rethink how such innovations can serve ELL students and bring them even closer to the performance levels of non-ELL students. Teachers can exercise a number of strategies to benefit ELL students with both new and traditional technology, as outlined below.

Differentiation

Because ELL students come into the classroom with varying challenges and needs, differentiation can be an effective way to ensure that all learners’ needs are fulfilled. Differentiation offers a number of options for students to learn the same key content or skills but in different ways.
Instruction can be differentiated through adapting the instructional content, the learning process, or the final product produced by the student. Laura Baecher (2011) suggests that differentiation for ELL students might consist of shortening a long text, adding visuals, offering options to work in a group or individually, or alternative assignments such as writing less or showing comprehension through a method other than writing.
With added technological capabilities in the classroom, teachers can differentiate even more. For example, ELL students might be able to type an assignment rather than handwriting it. These technological adaptations to the way students learn can help build student confidence. They also allow educators to keep the same learning goals across students with varying needs, including non-ELL students. With each lesson plan, teachers should question what differentiation plans might benefit ELL students while also taking advantage of the technology available in their classrooms.

Autonomy and Self-Directed Learning

When students are learning in a language other than their own native tongue, they can feel hopeless or like they have lost some control of their own learning. By promoting autonomous and self-directed learning, teachers can help ELL students gain a sense of confidence while also measuring themselves up to their own goals rather than comparing themselves to their non-ELL peers.
Although a completely self-directed learning program might not be possible in most K–12 schools, teachers can give students autonomy over their own learning in given activities or even for entire school days. Using technology such as gaming headsets, students can work individually and choose the listening and speaking activities they would like to complete on their own time.
Phil Benson and Peter Voller (2014) have explored autonomy in language learning extensively and note that computer software designed for language learners might claim to offer autonomous learning, but with a limited range of options on the software, this is not always the case. Rather than limiting ELL students to one program or one activity, giving them independence and flexibility with how they use technology to learn can promote engagement and allow them to work in their comfort zones.

Access to Diverse Language Content

One misconception of English language learning is that full immersion in the classroom is the best way for students to master language skills. If teachers relied only on classroom conversations to teach ELL students communication skills, they would lack understanding of essential areas such as academic language. Access to technology can diversify the listening, speaking, and writing activities that ELL students take part in.
A simple way for teachers to expose ELL students to different styles of English language usage is by having students listen to audiobooks. Students can listen to books ranging from To Kill a Mockingbird to The Hunger Games at a listening center for the purpose of completing a reading assignment or absorbing language skills. This practice can increase fluency and help students attach a pronunciation to a written word.
A language-rich classroom once might have been defined by the amount of print resources it held, but with growing access to computers and handheld devices, students have an infinite amount of resources to turn to for language experiences. Teachers can have students listen to and create podcasts or watch the latest TEDx Talk. Video editing and gaming software can also provide students new outlets to explore language outside of a conversational context.

Mobility

Teachers are becoming increasingly interested in making learning mobile. With the latest handheld gadgets and educational apps, students can access nearly any online resource while at home or on the go. As teachers continue to explore the concept of a mobile classroom, they should also consider how these capabilities could impact English language learning.
Some ELL students do not have access to English language resources when they are at home, due to living in a one-language household. With access to mobile technology, students can easily continue learning language skills outside of the classroom.
One study explored how the use of iPod Touches impacted ELL students’ behavior inside and outside of the classroom. The researchers found that having access to such devices gave students sociocultural capital in a nonjudgmental way for learning. Significantly, the students also used the devices with their parents and siblings. In this way, the use of mobile technology with ELL students could encourage more parent and family participation in the language-learning process.
Along with mobile technology, educators might want to consider how they can leverage mainstream social networks such as Snapchat and Instagram in ELL instruction. In addition to increasing motivation and building confidence, as one study suggests, utilizing social media networks in ELL instruction can teach digital literacy to ELL students, a vital 21st-century skill.

Multimodal Learning

According to French researchers, the sense of touch supports sight and hearing to provide more effective multisensory learning. A Science Daily article titled “Touch Helps Make the Connection between Sight and Hearing” further validated the connection of the sense of touch with language learning.
Though the technology is not new, educators can use vocabulary card readers to take a multimodal approach to teaching students language skills. With this tactile strategy, students can see, touch, and hear as they learn. Teachers can alter the original vocabulary cards by including stickers or cutting silhouettes for students to touch and relate to the words they are learning.
Beyond connecting touch to language learning, teachers can also cater to students who learn best through visual, audio, or written content. A study conducted in 2008 had ELL students complete a digital storytelling project to promote “mode switching.” Students had visual and verbal alternatives in content creation to communicate the concepts they were learning. For example, students might translate textbook materials into comic strips, utilizing multiple literacies in the project. These digital multimedia projects give students the opportunity to understand lesson content in a mode that makes sense to them.

Future ELL Instructional Innovations

As time goes on, the amount of technology available to educators only continues to grow. Teachers are just starting to explore the use of tools such as virtual reality, augmented reality, and wearable technology in the classroom. As ELL instructors look forward to all of the educational innovations that lie ahead, they must also consider the benefits of the tried-and-true technology that has supported ELL learning growth in years past.

Scott Evans is an audiovisual- and education-technology expert at Califone.

Language Magazine